Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 05953 12
Original file (05953 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

 

JSR
Docket No: 5953-12
3 October 2012

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records

 

To: Secretary of the Navy

| eT
REVIEW OF NA |

Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552

Encl: (1) DD Form 149 dtd 30 May 12 w/attachment

(2) HOMC MIQ memo dtd 20 Jul 12
(3) Subject's naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject,
hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with
this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval
record be corrected by removing the service record page 11
(“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 30 March 2006, a
copy of which is at Tab A.

2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Gorenflo, Grover and
Midboe, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice
on 3 October 2012, and pursuant to its regulations, determined
that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on
the available evidence of record. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval
records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record
pertaining to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice,
finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b. The contested entry includes the following:
Counseled this date concerning the following

deficiency on 28 Mar 2006 for violations of
the UCM [Uniform Code of Military Justice],
Specifically: Violf[ation] of Art[icle] 86:
Absence without leave. You had a scheculed
[sic] appointment at the Dental Clinic at
Camp Foster but failed to report. You were
asked why you missed your scheduled appoint -
ment and you stated, “I forgot.”.

c. Petitioner contends the entry is unjust because the
reason he forgot his dental appointment was that he was “focused
on completing the mission at work.” He also asserts that his
staff noncommissioned officer in charge ordered him not to make
a rebuttal.

d. In-correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the
Headquarters Marine Corps (HQMC) office having cognizance over
the subject matter of Petitioner's case has commented to the
effect that the contested entry is proper, except for its
reference to violations of the UCMJ, which are not deficiencies
and must be resolved by means of disciplinary action. This
advisory opinion recommends modifying the entry by deleting

“violations of the UCMJ, Specifically: Viol of Art 86: Absence
without leave.”

CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board
finds the existence of an error warranting partial relief,
specifically, modification of the contested entry by removal of
reference to a charge under the UCMJ. The Board notes that the
entry will not read correctly unless the word “for,” which
appears before the language the advisory opinion recommends
removing, is removed as well. The Board finds Petitioner’s
focus on his work, while commendable, did not excuse his having
forgotten his appointment; and it is unable to accept his
unsupported assertion that he was ordered not to submit a
rebuttal. The Board observes that he may submit a rebuttal to
HQOMC (MMSB) for file in his record with the entry at issue. In
view of the above, the Board directs the following limited
corrective action:

RECOMMENDATION:

a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing
the following from the service record page 11 (“Administrative
Remarks (1070)”) entry dated 30 March 2006: “for violations of
the UCM, Specifically: Viol of Art 86: Absence without leave.”
b. That any material or entries inconsistent with or
relating to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or

completely expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such
entries or material be added to the record in the future.

c. That any material directed to be removed from
Petitioner's naval record be returned to the Board, together
with a copy of this Report of Proceedings, for retention ina
confidential file maintained for such purpose, with no cross
reference being made a part of Petitioner's naval record.

d. That the remainder of Petitioner’s request be denied.

4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section’723.6(c)) it is certified that a quorum was
present at the Board's review and deliberations, and that the
foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board's
proceedings in the above entitled matter.

) ; Z '
Oo HK PN Caw oh (Er37 24
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN JONATHAN S. RUSKIN
Recorder Acting Recorder

S. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Cerrection of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

A eat 2) Zan

Fa_w. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04770-09

    Original file (04770-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Ms. Wilcher and Messrs. Bowen and McBride, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 9 July 2009, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below shouid be taken on the available evidence of record. Region 2, MCESC [sic] [Marine Corps Embassy Security Group], Counseled this date for the following deficiencies: Violations of Article 133 and Article 134 UCMI [Uniform Code of Military Justice] relating to an...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05330-01

    Original file (05330-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Evaluation Review Board Personnel Management Division Manpower and Reserve Affairs Department By direction of the Commandant of the Marine Corps 2 NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS DEPARTMENT OF THE 3280 RUSSELL ROAD QUANTICO, VIRGINIA 22134-5103 IN REPLY REFER TO: 1070 MIFD 'AUG 0 i,jbi I, MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS BCNR APPLICATION IN THE CASE OF SERGEANT SMC application with supporting documents has been reviewed concerning his...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02442-01

    Original file (02442-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 1 November 1997 to 26 March 1998. MC0 authorizes commanders to make entries on page 11 P1070.12H, Marine Corps Individual Records Administration (IRAM), 2. We defer comments/opinions and recommendations on Gunnery request for removal from his medical records o...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03156-01

    Original file (03156-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    You also made new requests to remove your relief for cause from recruiting duty, which was requested on 5 April 1999; your nonjudicial punishment of 29 March 1999; and your service record page 11 counseling entries dated 17 and 24 February 1999. We are asked to provide an advisory opinion on Petitioner's request for the removal from his Service Record Book (SRB) and his official military personnel file (OMPF) of all references to his nonjudicial punishment (NJP) of 29 March 1999 and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05454-02

    Original file (05454-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    application with supporting documents his for removal of the request 118(11) page 11 entry MC0 P1070.12K, Marine Corps Individual Records 2. fitness report that Staff Sergeant to provide counseling for personal and the a page 11 counseling should have no counseling is accomplished to overcome The event, were found in my record, The page 11 entry, not the iciencies. F 118(11) page 11 entry for removal Staff 2.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07981-02

    Original file (07981-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    07981-02 18 August 2003 Sub j : -USMCR, - From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Commandant, United States Marine Corps REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Enclosure BRIAN J. GEORGE By direction DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR C O R R E C T I O N O F NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX W A S H I N G T O N D C 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0 BJG Docket No: 7981-02 18 August 2003 From: To: Subj : Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy s o Y l l l s l l J E...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6737 14

    Original file (NR6737 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 5. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 HD Docket No. 1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 dtd 7 May 14 w/attachments (2) HOmMC JPL memo cata 14 Nov 14 (3) HOMC MIQ memo dtd 12 Jan 15 (4) Subject's e-mail dtd 12 Mar 15 w/attachments (5) Subject ’s naval record 1.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10463-06

    Original file (10463-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    They recommended removing the entry dated 14 November 2003 because it was not signed by Petitioner’s commander, as required because it indicated she could be the subject of administrative separation if she failed to take Corrective action.CONCLUSION:Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an error and injustice warranting the following corrective action: acknowledged the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 13191-10

    Original file (13191-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 20 May 2010 and his rebuttal dated 24 May 2010, copies of which are at Tab A. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Dixit, McBride and Vogt, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07980-08

    Original file (07980-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has directed removing the contested fitness report. Having reviewed all the facts of record, the Board has directed that your naval record will be corrected by removing the following fitness report: Date of Report Reporting Senior Period of Report 16 January 2006 20050101 to 20051231 (AN) 2. By direction DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3280 RUSSELL ROAD QUANTICO, VIRGINIA 22134-5103 1070 MIO SEP 8...